Earlier today the Home Office released some eye-catching stats on drug use. Since 1998 the number of 16-24yr olds self-reporting drug use has halved.
This tendency means that the extraordinarily positive trends in social policy data are largely hidden from the public. Did you know, for instance, that:
Teenage pregnancies are at their lowest level since records began in 1969. (Look at how that stat is buried beneath a supposedly negative story).
The number of 11-15 year olds who drank alcohol in the previous week has more than halved from 26% to 12% since 2001.
The number of 15 year olds smoking regularly has almost halved from 20% to 11% since 2002.
That the number of crimes reported in the Crime Survey have halved since 1995.
And it's not just the media's fault. These trends don't really fit with narratives of either the political right ("broken society") or the left ("austerity Britain") so they don't get talked about. It's also not particularly in the interests of groups that campaign on these issues to play-up the positive trends. It's much easier to raise money for drug prevention schemes if people don't think the problem is diminishing.
It seems to me that understanding why this is happening is pretty important. For a start it does seem to be generational. The drug stats, for instance, show use amongst 25-39 year olds rising. It's also unlikely to do with any UK specific issues or policies as these trends are manifesting across the developed world.
One journalist who has tried to focus attention on this phenomena is The Economist's Daniel Knowles. In an article last year he suggested a number of causes:
"Whatever has happened to carefree youth? Public-health campaigns, better education and more hands-on parenting have no doubt had some effect. Some young people are probably staying inside watching television and playing video games instead of smoking behind the bike sheds. And Britain’s population is changing. The proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds who identify themselves as “white British” has fallen slightly in the past decade, to about 80%. Among the groups filling the gap are British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, who are less likely to drink or take drugs than their white peers."
I'd add a couple more suggestions to the list including the increasingly negative portrayals of drug, cigarette and alcohol use in TV and films. Another suggestion that arose in twitter discussion today is that these are the children of a generation that were the highest users of dangerous substances; and there's nothing less cool than being like your parents...
Of these the change in social behaviours seems particularly important to me. Young people are just spending much less time in the physical world and much more time in the virtual. Even since 2007 there's been, according to Ofcom, a 25% increase in the average amount of time 12-15 year olds are spending online (to 17 hours a week). And girls in that age category send a frankly mind-boggling 221 texts a week on average.
Whatever the reasons the trend poses some interesting questions about how these shifts might affect the next generation of children. We know that young people whose parents are teen Mums, drug or alcohol addicts or in are in prison are much less likely to do well in school. If there are fewer such parents in the future it should have a significant knock on impact on education (as well as other public services like health and prisons).
It also means that jeremiads about "young people today" can be safely ignored. A narrative of decline around young people has been commonplace throughout history (though that famous Plato quote about children disrespecting their elders is sadly not genuine). But now more than ever we can safely say that young people are much more sensible than their elders were at their age.
What depresses me most about your links is the ongoing media negativity. Most of us who work in schools know the great things that are happening every day, but everything must be spun negatively by the national press. I wrote this in a fit of idealism last summer - but still stand by it!http://www.marketingadviceforschools.com/3/post/2012/11/who-is-responsible-for-the-good-news-in-education.html
ReplyDeleteOne of the suggestions for the fall in crime, and drug use would fit in that category as well, is that this generation have far more things to do / distract them. They don't need to go and hang around outside with their mates as they can message each other on Facebook, play games online together etc.
ReplyDeleteNone of this data surprises me at all over the 23 years of my teaching in inner city schools I have noticed a general shifting of attitudes amongst the students I teach. Children are much more motivated towards education generally and have greater self respect. Lots of reasons why but I think schools and teachers deserve some credit for delivering a consistent positive message.
DeleteAs you will know only too well, the impacts of policy tend to lag the introduction of policy. Whilst it is obvious that the facts give the lie to the right wing claims of "broken Britain" it is probably too early to judge the impact of austerity. History would tend to tell us that it is unlikely to have a positive effect on children.
ReplyDeleteThat aside, on the specific point of drug use, I'm not sure that what children are rebelling against is the idea that their parents are "cool". It's probably they have seen their parents as incompetents who can't look after them safely, and they don't want to be like them. I think I'm right in saying that drug use is the single biggest cause of very young children being removed from their parents. That is one end of the scale. That leaves huge numbers of children who have grown up in homes blighted by drug use. Kids learn quickly. So whilst the PHSE lessons undoubtedly had an impact, I think the sight of their friends living chaotic and unhappy lives probably had a greater impact.
When I tell people that I am a secondary school teacher there is one standard response: incredulity. This is usually followed by comments about how “tough” working with teenagers must be, as I am transformed, before my interlocutor’s eyes, from a diminutive 5’2” woman into an Amazonian who is brave enough to battle the Vicky Pollard generation. My protests that my students are lovely, largely conscientious and that I enjoy my work are taken as signs of a saint-like humility.
ReplyDeleteSource by Do my Coursework.
Living with drug addicted parents is not an easy thing. It leads to some kind of dangerous things for the rest of that child's life. This kind of problem must be send to rehabilitation center. We all know that rehabilitation centers are the best place for treatment. It might help them to bring their parents to a normal life. Regards: Admission essay writing service
ReplyDelete